首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of diabetic retinopathy classification using fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography angiography
【2h】

Comparison of diabetic retinopathy classification using fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography angiography

机译:使用荧光素血管造影和光学相干断层扫描血管造影对糖尿病性视网膜病变进行分类的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

PURPOSE:To analyse and compare the classification of eyes with diabetic retinopathy using fluorescein angiography (FA) and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) performed either with AngioPlex or AngioVue.METHODS:This was an observational cross-sectional study of 50 eyes from 26 diabetic subjects. Two independent graders classified the FA angiograms, to assess the presence and severity of several characteristics according to the ETDRS Report 11, and a similar evaluation was performed for each 3×3 mm OCTA image from the superficial retinal layer and for the full retina slab.RESULTS:Percentages of non-gradable images for the outline of foveal avascular zone (FAZ) in the central subfield (CSF) were 29.0% for FA, 12.0% for AngioVue and 3.0% for AngioPlex. For capillary loss, percentages of non-gradable images in the CSF were 25.0% for FA, 11% for AngioVue and 0.0% for AngioPlex. For the inner ring (IR), percentages of non-gradable images were 12.5% for FA, 11.5% for AngioVue and 0.5% for AngioPlex. Agreement between graders was substantial for outline of FAZ. For capillary loss, the agreement was fair for the CSF, and moderate for the IR.CONCLUSIONS:The OCTA allows better discrimination of the CSF and parafoveal macular microvasculature than FA, especially for FAZ disruption and capillary dropout, without the need of an intravenous injection of fluorescein. In addition, FA had also a higher number of non-gradable images. The OCTA can replace with advantage the FA, as a non-invasive and more sensitive procedure for detailed morphological evaluation of central macular vascular changes.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER:NCT02391558, Pre-results.
机译:目的:使用AngioPlex或AngioVue进行荧光素血管造影(FA)和光学相干断层扫描血管造影(OCTA),以分析和比较糖尿病视网膜病变的眼睛分类。科目。两名独立的评分员根据ETDRS报告11对FA血管造影照片进行了分类,以评估几种特征的存在和严重性,并对来自浅表视网膜层的每个3×3 mm OCTA图像和整个视网膜平板进行了类似的评估。结果:中央子区(CSF)的中央凹小凹血管区域(FAZ)轮廓的不可分级图像百分比分别为:FA为29.0%,AngioVue为12.0%,AngioPlex为3.0%。对于毛细血管丢失,FA中CSF中不可分级图像的百分比为25.0%,对于AngioVue为11%,对于AngioPlex为0.0%。对于内环(IR),FA的不可分级图像百分比为12.5%,AngioVue的图像为11.5%,AngioPlex的图像为0.5%。评分者之间的协议对于FAZ的大纲是至关重要的。对于毛细血管丢失,该协议对于CSF而言是公平的,对于IR而言是适度的。结论:OCTA可以比FA更好地区分CSF和黄斑旁黄斑微血管,尤其是对于FAZ破坏和毛细血管脱落,而无需静脉注射荧光素。此外,FA还具有更多的不可分级图像。 OCTA可以替代FA,作为一种无创且更敏感的程序,用于详细评估中央黄斑血管变化的形态学。试验注册号:NCT02391558,预结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号